The NGDS Pilot Project

University of Karachi

 

 

½ About the NGDS Pilot Project ½ The NGDS Team ½ Subprojects ½ Results ½ Publications ½ Links ½ Homepage of Project Director ½

                                                                                        
The NGDS Pilot Project URL: http://ngds-ku.org                         
The NGDS Pilot Project e-mail: info(at the rate of)ngds-ku.org


Results

Growth Analysis
Scoliosis Detection


Growth Analysis

Case 1: An Obese Child
Case 2: A Severely Underweight Child


Case 1:  An Obese Child

Date Format
Vital Statistics
Parents' Heights
History
Physical Examination
Anthropometry
Growth Profile
Summary of Findings

Implications
Recommendations

                                                                         
A parent approached the NGDS Team for possible        
short stature of her daughter. Here are the
measurements obtained during her four check ups.                

Date Format                                                                                                                               

All dates are given in the format Year-Month-Day                                     


Vital Statistics
Name: A. S.
Date of Birth: 1994-07-27
Sex: Female


Parents’ Heights
Mother (measured): 150.8 cm on 2000-10-25

Father (reported): 5 feet 6 inches

 

History
Between her second and her third check up A. S. was hospitalized. Mother reported weight loss.

 

Physical Examination
A. S. had normal heart sounds (standing and squatting positions).
A. S. showed signs of anemia during her first three check ups. Mother was asked to have Blood Hemoglobin done. Her condition considerably improved during the fourth check up.

A. S. had her knees joining and showed signs of trunk deformity during all her check ups. Mother was asked to have AP X ray (standing) of the entire spine (external auditory meatus to hip joint), for the
detection of scoliosis, done. A moiré examination is scheduled at the time of her fifth check up.

 
Anthropometry

First Checkup on 1999-03-01

Height: 96.0 cm (child relaxed and coöperative)

Mass: 13.5 kg (in short underpants)

Second Checkup on 2000-10-25

Height: 107.2 cm (child relaxed and coöperative)

Mass: 17.0 kg (in short school uniform)

Third Checkup on 2001-03-19

Height: 109.0 cm (child relaxed and coöperative)

Mass: 19.0 kg (in short school uniform)

Fourth Checkup on 2002-04-06

Height: 115.9 cm (child relaxed and coöperative)

Mass: 21.0 kg (in street clothes)

 
Growth Profile     Tabular Form     Graphical Form     Bar-Chart Form

Reference Adult Height: 152.72 cm (5 feet 0.1 inch)

Reference Adult Mass (Weight): 46.67 kg (102 lb 14.6 oz)

Reference CDC Growth Curves Percentile: 5.5 (the child is expected to follow this curve)

 

Between the First and the Second Checkup

Height-for-Age: 1.57 cm (0.62 inch) SHORT for age [STUNTED]

Height-Velocity-for-Age [compared to reference]: Height velocity 0.23 cm/year (0.09 inch/year) MORE than the reference value [growing FAST]

Height prediction: 108.9 cm (3 feet 6.9 inches) at the age 6 years 6 months

Mass-for-Age (Weight-for-Age): 0.07 kg LESS mass for age (UNDERWEIGHT for age by 2.6 oz)

Rate-of-Mass-Gain-for-Age (Rate-of-Weight-Gain-for-Age): 0.08 kg/year (0.17 lb/year) LESSER than the reference value [rate LOW]

Mass (Weight) Prediction: 17.54 kg (38 lb 10.8 oz) at the age 7 years

Biomass Index (BMI): 0.31 kg/m2 MORE than the reference value [OBESE]

Mass-for-Height (Weight-for-Height) [compared to reference]: 0.35 kg EXCESS mass for height
(OVERWEIGHT for height by 12.2 oz) [FAT]


Between the Second and the Third Checkup
Height-for-Age [compared to reference]:
1.35 cm (0.53 inch) SHORT for age [STUNTED]

Height-Velocity-for-Age [compared to reference]: Height velocity 1.53 cm/year (0.60 inch/year) LESSER than the reference value [growing SLOW]

Height prediction: 110.6 cm (3 feet 7.5 inches) at the age 7 years

Mass-for-Age (Weight-for-Age) [compared to reference]: 0.93 kg EXCESS mass for age

(OVERWEIGHT for age by 2 lb 0.6 oz)

Rate-of-Mass-Gain-for-Age (Rate-of-Weight-Gain-for-Age) [compared to reference]: 3.27 kg/year (7.20 lb/year) MORE than the reference value [rate HIGH]

Mass (Weight) Prediction: 20.80 kg (45 lb 13.8 oz) at the age 7 years

Biomass Index (BMI) [compared to reference]: 1.61 kg/m2 MORE than the reference value [OBESE]

Mass-for-Height (Weight-for-Height) [compared to reference]: 1.89 kg EXCESS mass for height.
(OVERWEIGHT for height by 4 lb 2.7 oz) [FAT]


Between the Third and the Fourth Checkup
Height-for-Age [compared to reference]:
1.06 cm (0.41 inch) SHORT for age [STUNTED]

Height-Velocity-for-Age [compared to reference]: Height velocity 1.03 cm/year (0.40 inch/year) MORE than the reference value [growing FAST]

Height prediction at the age 8 years: 117.9 cm (3 feet 10.4 inches) at the age 8 years

Mass-for-Age (Weight-for-Age) [compared to reference]: 1.53 kg excess mass for age

(OVERWEIGHT for age by 3 lb 6.1 oz)

Rate-of-Mass-Gain-for-Age (Rate-of-Weight-Gain-for-Age) [compared to reference]: 0.13 kg/year (0.29 lb/year) MORE than the reference value [rate HIGH]

Mass (Weight) Prediction [at the age 8 years]: 21.58 kg (47 lb 9.3 oz)

Biomass Index (BMI) [compared to reference]: 1.57 kg/m2 MORE than the reference value [OBESE]
Mass-for-Height (Weight-for-Height) [compared to reference]: 2.07 kg EXCESS mass for height.
(OVERWEIGHT for height by 4 lb 9.0 oz) [FAT]

Summary of Findings

The gap between reference height and actual height is DECREASING. However, A. S. is OVERWEIGHT both for age and for height.

Implications

The overweight condition may lead to CARDIAC PROBLEMS. It may, also, cause EARLY PUBERTY, and, eventually, STUNTING. 


Recommendations

A. S. must be, closely, watched for signs of TRUNK DEFORMITIES on a regular basis, using visual and moiré examinations. She must indulge in FAT-BURNING ACTIVITIES to control her weight.


Case 2:  A Severely Underweight Child

Here is the case of a girl belonging to a well-to-do family. She is studying in a private school, located in a posh area of Karachi. The child is youngest of three children, pampered by all family members. The Clinical Profile (sent to the child's pediatrician) and the Growth Profile (given and explained to the child's parents; a copy also sent to the child's pediatrician) are placed in the PDF Format. The child was examined by her pediatrician, who agreed with the preliminary diagnosis.

Open Acrobat Reader before downloading these files.

 

Clinical Profile of A. M. A. (PDF Format)

Growth Profile of A. M. A. (PDF Format)



Scoliosis Detection

Many 'C' and 'S' curves were detected, while conducting the checkups. A 'C' curve may be due to posture, but an 'S' curve is almost always pathological resulting in PERMANENT DEFORMITY as well as effects on VITAL and REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS.

In the
photo gallery one may examine the X ray of a 6-year old child having a 5-degree C curve. This curve was detected during the NGDS screening. All her 3 sisters (ages: 3 years, 9 years, 12 years) showed positive on forward-bending tests. These children are to be followed up by the NGDS Team, using visual and moiré examinations (a sample moiré is placed in the photo gallery).

A 10-year old girl with a positive forward bending was referred for X ray. An 'S' curve was confirmed. All her siblings were screened. Her 9-year old brother was checked. An 'S' curve was observed on physical examination. He was referred for X ray. Her 5 ½-year old bother was negative on examination. Another 8-year old girl had an 'S' curve confirmed on X ray. Her 5-year old sister was positive on physical examination. The team met fathers of these children who were advised to have the children examined by a pediatric orthopedist.

The NGDS Team strongly recommends screening all siblings if any child is tested positive on both forward bending and visual examination of back.
 
 
Updated: September 1, 2008 (0000h GMT)
                                                                                     Home Page

½ About the NGDS Pilot Project ½ The NGDS Team ½ Subprojects ½ Results ½ Publications ½ Links ½ Homepage of Project Director ½


Best viewed with 800 x 600 screen resolution using Microsoft Internet Explorer. Copyright 1998-2008. The NGDS Pilot Project